Opening one’s borders to allow people to have the chance to start a new life for themselves is a morally correct position. While the prospect of class conflict supercharged by ethnic antagonisms is a depressing one, a clear-eyed acknowledgment of the dangers involved with an open borders policy may allow America to more fully enjoy the benefits that immigrants can bring. "There were Asian-exclusion laws. Those on opposing sides of the political aisle as well as economists offer pros and cons for keeping borders open and also exercising caution on border policy. The first favors an open borders policy, where the free flow of migrants across our borders is welcomed and amnesty is granted to those who previously crossed the border … If you have lots of opportunity and no taxpayer funded social services there is almost nor reason to turn anyone away unless they are criminal or diseased. There are a few issues that would make an open border between the U.S. and Canada impossible. This is spent mainly on its southern border … But if you put that aside, it was open borders for the rest of the world." The economist Bryan Caplan often asks his readers to imagine how they would feel if trapped in impoverished and tyrannical states. On the contrary, many countries are moving to strong or closed borders. It’s not going to happen. Supporters of open borders say they help keep the balance of free trade going with other countries, allowing for the free flow of goods and services, according to OpenBorders.info . With the notable exception of the European Union where open borders exist among its members, no other nations have adopted an open border immigration policy. U.S. has them, Canada has limitations on what you can own, how you store and transport them, etc. So, let’s discuss the pros and cons of open borders. Advocates for open borders cite Rousseau’s words: “man is born free, yet everywhere he is in chains”. The EU needs to protect its territory from a growing number of African migrants and institute a new asylum protocol that is humane and yet pragmatic. Guns. "Really, the United States was an open-border situation, worldwide, up through the early 1900s -- except for Asians," Hing told The Huffington Post. Border control is a huge financial burden for a country. The risks of having open borders. According to them, barbed wires, concrete walls built along the borders should be removed and all people should be allowed to freely roam in the earth irrespective of human made barriers known as borders. Open borders advocates tend to be “moral egalitarians”; that is, they believe in treating human beings symmetrically. Pros of Open Borders 1. Advocates for open borders are not arguing for wholly elimination of borders but rather for changes in how those affected might move across them and in how they are understood. What are pros and cons of a country having open borders? 18 billion dollars was spent per year by the United States on its border control. While after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 there were only 15 border walls, today there are 70 of them. Advantages and Arguments for Open Borders. Eliminates the Cost of Border Control. Arguments for open borders are based not merely on economics but on ethics. Although some will always take advantage of an open borders policy, the benefits to society by having welcoming arms …